Immigrating as a pair by Specific Entry: what you should learn about itemizing a companion as non-accompanying…

In case you’re making use of for Canadian everlasting residence (PR) by Specific Entry and also you’re a part of a pair, you may checklist your partner or common-law companion (“companion”) as accompanying or non-accompanying in your software.

This text will cowl

• When to checklist a companion as non-accompanying;
• When itemizing a companion as non-accompanying can increase considerations;
• Greatest practices and customary errors; and
• How can enhance their probabilities of getting an Invitation to Apply (ITA) for PR.

Get a Free Specific Entry Evaluation

Accompanying vs non-accompanying

You should embrace your partner or common-law companion (“companion”) in any immigration software – to omit a companion in your expression of curiosity or software could be misrepresentation, and may result in a refusal or an immigration ban.

In itemizing your companion, you have got the choice of designating your companion as accompanying or non-accompanying.

In case you checklist your companion as accompanying, then you may embrace them in your software for everlasting residency, and they are often granted everlasting residency similtaneously you might be, in case your software is profitable.

In case you checklist your companion as non-accompanying, you could embrace them in your PR software and state that your companion is at present not accompanying you. In case your PR software is profitable, you’ll obtain PR, however your companion is not going to.

The next desk summarizes the implications of itemizing a companion as accompanying vs non-accompanying:

Itemizing a companion as non-accompanying

Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) permits candidates to designate a companion as non-accompanying in an Specific Entry profile.

In case you checklist a companion as non-accompanying, you might be claiming that they won’t be settling in Canada similtaneously you.

There are legitimate the explanation why you and your companion would possibly select to not settle in Canada on the identical time. For instance, in case your companion has a thriving profession overseas or household obligations that don’t permit them to accompany you to Canada.

In case you intend to settle in Canada collectively, you could not checklist your partner as non-accompanying — doing so constitutes misrepresentation, and may result in refusal of your PR software and probably a five-year ban on Canadian immigration.

Scoring of candidate profiles with an accompanying companion

Itemizing a companion as accompanying or non-accompanying could have an effect on your probabilities of receiving an invite to use for PR by Specific Entry, as a result of your profile rating beneath the Complete Rating System (CRS) can be calculated in a different way.

In each instances, the utmost factors your profile can rating within the core human capital + spousal components is 500.

Relying in your companion’s language expertise, schooling, and Canadian work expertise, together with your companion as accompanying could lead to both a better or a decrease rating than itemizing them as non-accompanying.

Instance

Let’s take the case of Shannon and her husband Jeff. Shannon is in search of everlasting residency as a candidate beneath the Canadian Expertise Class.

Shannon is 27 years previous and has a grasp’s diploma in biology, which she accomplished in Canada. She has one 12 months of Canadian work expertise, one 12 months of international work expertise, and Canadian Language Benchmark stage 9+.

Jeff is 32 years previous and doesn’t have any Canadian work expertise. He has accomplished secondary college schooling and has a CLB stage of 6.

If Shannon creates an Specific Entry profile as a sole applicant, itemizing Jeff as her accompanying partner, her CRS rating is 539—excessive sufficient to have certified for a number of current Canadian Expertise Class attracts.

But when Shannon lists Jeff as an accompanying partner, her profile’s CRS rating could be 513 factors. That is beneath the cut-off scores all of all CEC attracts in 2025, as of the time of writing.

In case your profile scores greater by itemizing your companion as non-accompanying, you could be tempted to checklist them as such to maximise your probabilities of receiving an ITA when submitting your Specific Entry profile. It’s doable to checklist a companion as non-accompanying, and to provoke spousal sponsorship after having grow to be a everlasting resident.

However it is best to solely checklist your companion as non-accompanying should you really intend for them to not accompany you to Canada; you shouldn’t checklist your companion as non-accompanying disingenuously as a method for maximizing your profile’s CRS rating.

To checklist a companion as non-accompanying, you could have a authentic cause for an intention on your companion to not accompany you to Canada.

In case your choice to submit your EOI with a companion as non-accompanying is barely to maximise your rating, and you might be in actual fact planning on settling in Canada along with your companion instantly (i.e., they are going to in actual fact be accompanying you), this constitutes misrepresentation, and will result in your software being refused and even a five-year ban on Canadian immigration.

IRCC could request full transparency concerning the motivations for itemizing a companion as non-accompanying, and you could have a authentic cause for having completed so.

Problematic situations for itemizing a companion as non-accompanying

In case your companion is already in Canada with you: Dwelling collectively and residing in the identical handle contradicts the definition of non-accompanying. So, if a declared non-accompanying companion is already in Canada with the you, the officer reviewing your software is prone to problem you a Procedural Equity Letter (PFL) as a consequence of inconsistency.

Including a companion after submission: If an applicant initially designates their companion as non-accompanying, and later makes an attempt so as to add them as an accompanying member of the family to the appliance after submission, this can set off a reassessment, together with a evaluate of the companion’s eligibility and a recalculation of the CRS, along with elevating considerations of misrepresentation.* This might jeopardize the PR software.

*In case you do add a companion after submission, there ought to be a authentic cause for having completed so, corresponding to a change in your marital standing through the software course of.

Dos and don’ts making use of by Specific Entry as a pair

Don’ts

Failure to reveal a companion: Candidates ought to at all times disclose their companion, whether or not they’re accompanying or non-accompanying. Failure to reveal a companion is taken into account misrepresentation, which may end up in software refusal, a five-year re-application ban, and even the revocation of PR standing.

Attempt to circumvent inadmissibility: If a companion is, on the time of software, deemed ineligible or inadmissible (e.g., as a consequence of medical, prison, or immigration grounds), the whole software can be rendered inadmissible. Declaring a companion as non-accompanying just isn’t a method to avoid inadmissibility points.

Inconsistencies within the software: Candidates ought to make sure that the knowledge supplied is constant. Claiming to be married in a single software and single in one other will increase considerations.
Submitting deceptive or incomplete documentation a few relationship could result in scrutiny as IRCC routinely cross-checks data for discrepancies.

Making adjustments after receiving an ITA (until obligatory): Candidates mustn’t try so as to add their companion as accompanying after receiving an ITA, until their marital standing modified post-submission (e.g., a wedding occurred after the appliance was submitted submit ITA receipt).

Omitting data or submitting deceptive data: Doing so will represent misrepresentation.

Dos

Submit correct documentation: Candidates should have supporting documentation corresponding to a wedding certificates, proof of an ongoing relationship, and a well-articulated Letter of Clarification (LoE) prepared.

Analysis household class sponsorship: If the plan is for the companion to be sponsored post-landing, understanding the necessities of the Household Class sponsorship course of is a should. For instance, this route features a situation that the sponsor (as a everlasting resident) should stay bodily current in Canada all through the method.

Can each companions in a pair submit separate Specific Entry profiles?

Every companion can create their very own Specific Entry profile with themself as the first applicant whereas designating their companion as accompanying.

Instance:

Take the case of a married couple, Mary and Bob.
Mary could be the principal applicant in a single profile, with Bob listed as her partner. In the meantime, Bob can submit a separate profile with himself because the principal applicant, itemizing Mary as his partner.

This technique is legitimate beneath the next situations:

• Each profiles are full and factually correct.
• There isn’t a misrepresentation or conflicting data.

Just one software strikes ahead as soon as an Invitation to Apply (ITA) is issued, sometimes for the partner with the upper Complete Rating System (CRS) rating or higher eligibility beneath a focused draw. The opposite profile can then be withdrawn or allowed to run out.

This method will be particularly helpful when the lower-scoring of the 2 profiles qualifies for draw varieties that the higher-scoring profile wouldn’t, corresponding to category-base choice for French-language proficiency or in-demand occupations..

Get a Free Specific Entry Evaluation